User description

WebhardCompared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible. File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).Webhard It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.You should share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you should discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)Google DriveIt exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite). Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.There are the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)DropboxIt exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB. The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. p2p 순위 Dirty bastards...You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. The dropbox itself cannot be documented.There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely. In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.Slow. Not paid people. Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***SkydriveThe writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.