User description

what's webhard?When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible. File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).Webhard It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.You will need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)It includes a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you should discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)Google DriveIt exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite). Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)DropboxIt exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.There are various means of increasing capacity. p2p 순위 Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB. The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. The dropbox itself can't be documented.There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely. In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.Slow. Not paid people. Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***SkydriveThe writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.